The future of Honda’s role in the IndyCar Series hangs in the balance as the expiration of its supply contract looms in 18 months. David Salters, U.S. president of Honda Racing Corporation, remains tight-lipped about whether the company will continue its long-standing rivalry with Chevrolet beyond the 2026 season.
Penske Entertainment, the series owner, is in the process of developing a new car and engine formula, which could be introduced as soon as 2027. However, it could also be delayed until 2028. Should a gap year occur in 2027, new agreements would need to be negotiated with Honda to continue its supply of the current 2.2-liter twin-turbo V6 engine, assuming Honda has an interest in doing so.
Honda, a constant presence in the series since 1993, could alternatively decide to exit the series altogether. With substantial investments in the hybrid GTP formula of IMSA’s WeatherTech SportsCar Championship, expansion plans into the FIA World Endurance Championship, and a potential move into NASCAR’s Cup series, Honda has no shortage of racing options outside of IndyCar.
Salters discussed Honda’s potential future in IndyCar during a recent two-day IndyCar test at Sebring. He highlighted that the company’s ultimate decision would be influenced by several factors, including the desires of Honda fans and customers, the development of their people and technology, and financial feasibility.
Honda Racing Corporation operates as an independent entity, considering both short-term and long-term plans and ensuring return on investment. Balancing the books is a crucial part of Salters’ role as president. He stated, “We look at our plans and try and figure out what’s going to work for Honda and Acura to do a number of things. What’s going to help develop our people and our technology best? What’s going to show that to our fans and customers and make them proud? What’s going to promote our brand well?”
Salters emphasized his love for IndyCar racing and particularly the Indy 500, but also acknowledged the realities of business decision-making. He compared it to running a household, where there are limits to what can be done and a constant need for review and reassessment.
Despite the uncertain future, Salters assured that Honda’s review process was normal and should not cause alarm. He also expressed his belief that the decision to stay or go should be informed by the engine formula in place, which is yet to be defined. Salters suggested that rule makers should aim to establish rules two years ahead of a major change to allow for efficient and cost-effective adaptation.
In conclusion, while the future of Honda’s participation in the IndyCar Series may be uncertain, the company’s passion for racing and commitment to its fans and customers remain unwavering. The next 18 months promise to be a critical period for all parties involved as they navigate the ever-evolving landscape of motorsports.